Personhood

Jan. 9th, 2012 11:10 pm
cholten99: (Default)
[personal profile] cholten99
As I've mentioned before I'm a big fan of the Future of the Constitution series from the Brookings Institution. I still have a backlog of their excellent articles to read but tonight I've found time to go through Endowed by Their Creator?: The Future of Constitutional Personhood.

This is an excellent essay covering both the creation of intelligence in machines (via AI) and the reduction of intelligence in humans (via genetics) to present arguments on exactly what makes a "person". Comments comparing AI restriction to abortion mix with warnings about the previous times in history groups of people have decided that some entities are not 'persons'. Statements such as those suggesting that any being that can hold moral values is 'human' is dispatched by pointing out that many animals can be shown to act 'morally'. Further reflection on already existing corporate non-human persons is briefly touched on.

However, perhaps the only solid conclusion is that while liberals struggle with the weighty problems of defining what is a 'person' conservatives and theologians will continue to resist the expansion of fundamental rights to any further group of beings - just as they have for women, gays, 'lesser races' and people with heretical thoughts.

Date: 2012-01-10 09:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prunesquallormd.livejournal.com
Looks interesting. Shall try and make time to read that soon.
(It also makes me wonder what happened with the Mississippi Personhood Amendment at the end of last year. At least one religiously based 'personhood' website I looked at used the 'previous times in history groups of people have decided that some entities are not 'persons'' as an anti-abortion argument too).

Profile

cholten99: (Default)
cholten99

February 2013

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 25th, 2017 08:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios